Chris Katko: I don't drive. I don't even have a license. If you're so concerned about the pollution cars make, than throw away your license and stop driving. The western nations are about the cleanest when it comes to pollution as any others in the world. If you want to tackle pollution, than you need to talk to the Asian nations where 90% of it comes from. Any tiny difference we make won't effect a thing with the pollution they are putting into the air and ocean.

As for nuclear power, I have a word for you; RADIATION or how about CHERNOBYL, FUKASHIMA or THREE MILE ISLAND?! I suggest you go camping in FUKASHIMA for a while, or maybe CHERNOBYL, the results may shock you! Nuclear power clean and green?! Wow...

I thought Warren already dropped out.

He's also going completely senile and the MSM is desperately trying to cover it up. They're now reporting that the (1 of 3000+) verbal slipups he had at a convention saying "we're going to re-elect Trump" was "deceptively edited" as part of some conservative plot.

Except... I found the video... on the bernie sanders subreddit. It wasn't deceptively edited. It shows a senile old man being senile. The words "we're going to re-elect trump" isn't the important part. The important part is he doesn't know what the hell he's saying.

His verbal gaffs are too many to frivolously discount. If the DNC wants a senile old man, it's because they know they can control him.

Can you imagine, how INSANE the presidential debate vs Trump will be? No amount of MSM editing will save him if they're watching it live.

In other news, I just about died laughing when I seen this meme today.
{"name":"612369","src":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/3\/239c25166a03de2ae301399f211e6fcb.jpg","w":362,"h":315,"tn":"\/\/djungxnpq2nug.cloudfront.net\/image\/cache\/2\/3\/239c25166a03de2ae301399f211e6fcb"}

Canadians do not vote for the Prime Minister. Canadians vote for an MP (or MPP at the provincial level), who is supposed to be a local representative to give their region a voice in government. The elected MPs (or MPPs) then vote for Prime Minister or Premier, and typically that means the party of allies that won the most seats will elect their party leader. In this case, the Liberals won more seats than anyone else and so Trudeau was re-elected. You're right that the system attempts to restore some balance to prevent heavily populated regions from controlling all of the power, however, it does a decidedly poor job of this. If you actually care about getting what you want you should vote for a local representative most likely to represent your needs. Voting for a party to be in power, or for a party based upon its leader, means that you will be getting what the party wants instead of what you want or need. And unless you're in the top 1% that likely won't do you much good overall. Voting Conservative when you aren't in the top 1% pretty much guarantees you're going to get robbed (case in point: Alberta and Ontario).

Though the Conservatives, NOT Scheer, got more votes overall than the Liberals; the Liberals won more seats because they had the most votes in more ridings than other parties. More regions didn't want Conservative than those that did.

Of course, we all know that first-past-the-post is a very poor system because while one way to interpret the results is that 33.1% of Canadians wanted Liberals in power and 34.4% of Canadians wanted Conservatives in power^[1]. The better way to interpret the results though is that 63.6% of Canadians did NOT want Conservatives in power, and 64.9% of Canadians did NOT want Liberals in power.

Many of the votes for Liberal or Conservative MPs were out of desperation because the first-past-the-post system does not allow everyone's vote to actually count. Many people vote strategically for the lesser evil in their riding because they'd rather have a chance to avoid the worst evil than waste their vote on a candidate that can't realistically get the most votes, at no fault of their own or their politics. I was fortunately able to vote Green in my riding for 2019, and still have the Liberal candidate win; but in the previous election I strategically voted Liberal to keep the Conservative candidate out.

Constitutional originalism is not the same as activism. But we know you don't understand the difference.

Says the man who probably thinks Roe v Wade was activism.

Can't wait for the Republican senate to extend civil rights to protect gender identity when the activist Republican judges make it legal to fire peeps if they're transgender. You know, that big Supreme Court case that's been going on for a few months now.

Wait, that's not going to happen...

How's everyone's stocks doing?

I moved all my shares of DOW to a high interest savings account a month ago #sheltered

It's gonna be a nice boost once I opt back in when the volatility decreases.

Aaron, there is no constitutional right to abortion. It was a twisted legal ruling that very well may not survive another generation. Never mind inconvenient realities like the founder of Planned Parenthood being a racist eugenicist who wanted to lower the black population. It doesn't matter that I'm a man that I have strong opinions on abortion, it matters because directly murdering humans for selfish reasons is objectively evil. And spare me any of the boring leftist tripe like the use of fossil fuels makes me a global scale murderer and that kind of blah, blah, blah.

And yes, I agree that it shouldn't be executive policies and courts that fill in gaps left by the legislative branch. Both sides need to be willing to compromise a certain amount, but politics is polarizing. There are fringe elements on each side that demand things the other side will never agree to, ie. banning abortions under ALL circumstances (even rape or critical physical health complications in the mother) or open borders.

It still exists. Immigrants are still welcome to enter the nation legally. This has always been the case, and under the last three presidents they have all talked about the need to crack down on ILLEGAL immigrants. And there are LEGAL immigrants that entered LEGALLY that support Trump on this, just as they probably supported Obama when Obama spoke out against Illegals, or Bush, or Bill Clinton. They are all on record speaking out against illegals. NONE of them, including Trump has a problem with LEGAL immigrants and he has said so. Heck, Trump's wife is a legal immigrant.

Quit swallowing the leftist propaganda and do some research on it.